I love the description in “My Tea with Madame Descartes”, especially when the author is talking about Madame Descartes herself. David St. John, the author, really uses great analogies to describe how beautiful she is in his eyes. Excerpts such as “I’d never seen a beauty like hers, riveting as the Unicorn’s soft eye…..her beauty was singular, Volcanic, viscous…as inevitable as lava moving slowly toward you... Her beauty was so close to a vengeance-one exacted by the world upon those of us so ordinary, so weak, we can barely admit its existence” really jump out at me and I find myself reading them over again. The main reason is that I don’t understand how people think like that, or think of analogies as unique as the ones David St. John uses. I mean, I know everybody has different talents and skills, but being able to write that creatively is one that I really respect because I am so NOT good at it.
I also think its is interesting how we don’t realize that the person giving the interview is so self conscious until the very end of the story because of how he reacts to having his picture taken. Once I realized this, I went ahead and re-read the story, and I could really see how his character is self-conscious throughout the whole story, it just isn’t obvious until after you’ve read the end. That was a very new experience for me, I have never gone back and re-read something unless forced to, but after reading the ending, I had a better idea of what the characters were like when reading it the second and third times. Anyways I’m sure most of you are much more into literature so you’ve experienced this many, many times before, but I just though I would share my new found accomplishment haha…goodnight, sweet dreams